AsterVale AdvisoryROI & pilot decision · 60-user scopeModel date · 08 Oct 2026

Recommendation · validate before rollout

Validate value in a pilot.
Expand when the evidence supports it.

Proceed with the planned 12-user pilot before committing to 60 users. The planning estimate yields $33,622 in Year 1 net economic benefit and 30.3% ROI; the conservative case is negative. Rollout depends on accepted quality, usable capacity and a refreshed investment case.

Planning estimate · Year 1 net economic benefit
+$33,622
30.3% economic ROI · after total economic cost

$144,442 in estimated capacity value less $110,820 in economic cost. Assumes 35% less preparation time, 70% adoption and 100% productive use of released time. Benefits remain subject to pilot validation.

Capacity value · non-cash$144,442Planning case, Year 1 after ramp
Documented cash savings modeled$0No paid-spend reduction is evidenced
Supplier fees · Year 1$79,200Estimated vendor cash outflow, before tax
Internal capacity cost · Year 1$31,620Valued staff time; not supplier cash

Returns depend on adoption and usable time

Year 1 · 1 Dec 2026–30 Nov 2027 · USD before tax

MeasurePlanning estimateConservative estimate
Time reduction / steady-state adoption35% / 70%20% / 50%
Productive use of released time100%75%
Year 1 released hours1,699 h694 h
Year 1 capacity value · non-cash$144,442$44,217
Steady-state annual capacity value$203,918/yr$62,424/yr
Year 1 net economic benefit / ROI+$33,622 / 30.3%−$66,603 / −60.1%

Baseline: 816 eligible preparation hours/month across the 60-user scope, with no overlap between the three work categories. Both cases apply the same benefit ramp and $85/hour staff-cost basis; savings factors apply once. Steady-state annual value excludes the ramp. No cash savings or additional economic overlap are evidenced; both are modeled at $0.

First-year cost ledger · before tax

$79,200Estimated vendor cash fees
$69,600 subscription + support; $9,600 implementation
$31,620Allocated internal capacity
96 setup h + 180 training h + 8 admin h/month, at $85/h
$110,820Total economic cost
Vendor fees plus valued internal effort

$14,180 below the $125,000 evaluation ceiling before tax. Additional usage, integration or migration charges require separate costing; budget headroom does not establish investment approval.

Benefits ramp after implementation

Dec ’26 · 0%Feb · 25%May · 100%Nov ’27

Planning assumption: 1 Dec start, six-week implementation, no benefit in months 1–2, then 25% / 50% / 75% / 100% of steady-state benefit. Update the ramp to reflect measured readiness and expected rollout adoption.

Economic break-even · 76.7%At 35% time reduction and 70% adoption, at least 76.7% of released time must be put to productive use to cover Year 1 costs. At 75% productive use, net economic benefit falls to −$2,488. Cash payback is not established.

Rollout decision: Jonah and Rachel validate ten pilot work packages, counting failed tasks and review effort and checking accuracy, source traceability and editable outputs. Elena and Victor assess adoption and productive use, then refresh the model. Expand when quality is accepted, the refreshed economic case is positive and security, contract and budget approvals are recorded; otherwise revise scope or extend validation.